Elderlake Partners

02 · Floor mechanics — S-TREA in practice

Art 92(3)–(7) · 465 CRR

Purpose & history

Single stack, and why it was the fight

Basel's floor text is one sentence; the EU fight was about where the floored number goes. Under parallel stacks, the floor would have applied only to the Basel minimum — P2R, the CBR and MREL would have kept riding on unfloored, model-based TREA, quarantining the floor's effect to a number few requirements actually reference. The adopted single stack sends floored TREA into everything: minima, P2R (recalibrated once at the switch to avoid double counting), buffers, MREL, large-exposure bases. That single design decision is why the floor is a balance-sheet event rather than a disclosure footnote — and why the transitionals were the political price. The supervisor's counterpart obligation: P2R and nominal buffer amounts must not silently double-charge risks the floor now covers; the EBA monitors, and banks argue, precisely this.

What S-TREA actually contains

The standardised tower is not "SA credit risk" alone: it is the standardised measure of every risk class — SA-CR (with the Art 465 transitional calibrations), SA-CCR, BA-/SA-CVA as applicable, SMA op risk, FRTB standardised market risk, and the securitisation hierarchy with halved p-factors. IMM, IRB and A-IMA banks therefore run two full production stacks forever. The floor is also computed at each level of application — group and relevant sub-levels — so the data must reconcile at every node.

Requirements

Dual-engine architectureSA engines running at IRB data quality: same cut-off, same perimeter, reconciled exposure-by-exposure to the internal run. The reconciliation report is a supervisory artefact.
Transitional switchesArt 465(3)–(5) calibrations (mortgage split, 65% corporates, halved p) apply in S-TREA only, each with its own sunset — versioned rule tables, not hard-coded weights.
DisclosureKM1/OVC-style templates showing floored vs unfloored TREA and the ratio impact; the U/S ratio is now a followed KPI.
Forward planningCapital plans projecting both towers through 2033: x steps, transitional sunsets, portfolio drift. The binding-constraint switch date is a plannable, plan-it event.

Calculations

S-TREA build-up vs U-TREA — where the gap lives U: IRB credit €45bn + IMM-CCR €3bn + SA-CVA €3bn + A-IMA €5bn + SMA €8bn = €64bn
S: SA credit €78bn + SA-CCR €4bn + BA-CVA €3bn + FRTB-SA €7bn + SMA €8bn = €100bn
U/S = 64% → floor binds from x = 65% (2028). Decomposing the €36bn gap: €33bn of it is credit — the floor is, in practice, a mortgage-and-corporate-model event; op risk contributes nothing (same SMA in both towers).
Marginal thinking under a binding floor Once floored, the marginal capital cost of new business is set by its SA weight, not its model weight: a 12.5%-IRB mortgage prices at 72.5% × 37% ≈ 27% effective RW (or ≈ 15% while the transitional holds). Pricing desks that still quote IRB-marginal capital are subsidising the back book.

Changes & sources

Transitional (S-TREA only)CalibrationUntil
Residential mortgages (conditions met)10% / 45% split at 55% ETV31·12·2032
Unrated investment-grade corporates65% RW31·12·2032
Securitisation p-factors0.5 non-STS / 0.25 STS31·12·2032
Cap on floored TREA≤ 1.25 × unflooredmember-state option
  • Sources: Art 92(3)–(7), Art 465; EBA floor-monitoring reports; Pillar 3 ITS. Extension of any transitional needs Level 1 legislation — track the Commission review, not the rumour.

Independent analysis by Elderlake Partners, as at August 2026. Not legal, accounting or supervisory advice.