05 · BA-CVA — the workhorse
Art 384 CRR
Purpose & history
A closed-form portfolio model
The BA-CVA is what remains when supervisors want CVA capital without CVA models: a closed-form approximation of a one-factor spread portfolio. Each counterparty gets a standalone charge (SCVA) proportional to risk weight × maturity × exposure; the aggregation then splits the book into a systematic component (spreads move together, ρ = 50% — hedgeable with indices) and an idiosyncratic component (they don't — hedgeable only name-by-name). Every design choice follows: single-name CDS reduce the name's own term with an rhc discount for basis; index CDS reduce only the systematic term; the HMA penalises hedges booked against the wrong name; and β = 25% floors the whole exercise because a supervisor who abolished CVA models does not then fully trust CVA hedge accounting either. The DS = 0.65 scalar is simply the 2020 recalibration admitting the 2017 numbers were too high.
Requirements
Calculations
K_red = √((0.5×3.59)² + 0.75×(2.59²+1.00²))
= √(3.22 + 5.78) = €3.00m vs €3.59m summed — the (1−ρ²) term grants 16% idiosyncratic diversification, automatically.
K = 0.65 × (0.25×2.59 + 0.75×0.78) = €0.80m vs €1.68m unhedged; floor at 0.65×0.25×2.59 = €0.42m.
Changes & sources
| Old (CRR2 Art 384) | BA-CVA |
|---|---|
| Standardised CVA: bond-equivalent VaR formula | Portfolio-consistent SCVA aggregation, explicit hedge terms |
| Hedges crudely recognised | rhc ladder, index recognition, HMA, β floor |
- Sources: Art 384; Basel MAR50. Watch the exemption review — scope, not calibration, is where EU CVA capital really moves.
Independent analysis by Elderlake Partners, as at August 2026. Not legal, accounting or supervisory advice.