03 · Standardised approach — credit risk
Art 111–141 CRR
Purpose & history
From address book to instrument panel
Basel I weighted by who (sovereign, bank, mortgage, other); Basel II added rated how (ECAI grades); CRR3's SA finally asks what and how risky — LTV bands for property, project phase for specialised lending, transactor behaviour for cards, assessed counterparty grades for unrated banks. The redesign had one strategic driver: the output floor needs a yardstick credible enough that being floored to it is defensible. A second driver is jurisdictional: the US cannot use external ratings (Dodd-Frank §939A), so the framework had to work both with ratings (EU: ECAI + due diligence) and without (SCRA) — the same rule text carrying two philosophies.
The due-diligence overlay is the quiet novelty: banks must assess whether the external rating flatters the obligor and may only adjust the weight upward. Mechanistic reliance on ratings — the 2008 charge — is now formally the bank's problem.
Requirements
Calculations
Changes & sources
| Area | CRR2 → CRR3 |
|---|---|
| Mortgages | 35% flat → loan-splitting 20/75 or ETV whole-loan; IPRE own table |
| Banks | Unrated: flat by sovereign → SCRA A/B/C; CQS2 30% |
| Corporates | Unrated IG 65% only inside the floor transitional; SME 85% retained via factor |
| Retail | Transactor 45%; currency-mismatch ×1.5 |
| Equity/sub-debt | 100% → 250/400% (phase-in) / 150% |
| Off-balance | UCC 0% → 10% (phased); CCF ladder rebuilt |
- Sources: Art 111–141; mapping ITS; EBA GL on transactors and IPRE dependence tests. Watch: unrated-corporate transitional review — the SA's biggest EU-vs-Basel gap.
Independent analysis by Elderlake Partners, as at August 2026. Not legal, accounting or supervisory advice.